Representative for the northern United States, Elise Stefanik, again voted against the $ 1.9 trillion American Rescue Act, a COVID relief bill proposed by President Joe Biden and passed by Democrats in Congress. She called it a “Partisan package disguised as COVID-19 relief”.
Stefanik, R-Schuylerville, voted against this bill two weeks ago, but after the Senate made amendments he returned to the House, where Stefanik again voted against on Wednesday. The bill is now awaiting Biden’s expected signing.
“Rather than focusing on bipartisan COVID-19 relief to safely reopen our economy and schools, (House of the Majority) Nancy Pelosi, (Senate Majority Leader) Chuck Schumer, and President Biden instead adopted a $ 1.9 trillion partisan spending package stuffed with their far-left wishlist.
The bill, which has been the subject of open debate since February 2, has been praised by supporters hoping it will reclaim a nation crippled by pandmeic, but Stefanik said the bill is not not focused and sticks to taxpayers a “A note of nearly $ 2 trillion. “
Stefanik said less than 9% of spending is on public health measures, and more than a third of the funds won’t be spent until 2022 or later.
“Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, I have successfully provided billions of dollars in funding to the North Country and have supported several bipartisan packages,” Stefanik said in a statement.
It said it funds research, development and distribution of vaccines; supporting small businesses, schools, hospitals, farms and families; and reopening the economy were his goals. She said the Democrats’ bill should have focused “On the distribution of the $ 1 trillion that remains unspent from previous bipartisan COVID-19 packages. “
She said Pelosi accepted less than 1% of the Republicans’ proposed amendments.
Among these, Republicans have tried to include prisoners blocking the language and undocumented immigrants – what Stefanik calls illegal immigrants – to receive stimulus checks.
Not all prisoners will receive stimulus checks – only those who file their taxes.
People who have exceeded their visa term will only receive stimulus checks if they pay taxes using a Social Security number.
Millions of undocumented immigrants living in America pay their taxes each year using an individual tax ID number instead of a Social Security number. Unlike previous COVID aid proposals, they will not be eligible for stimulus checks, but if their children are citizens and have SSNs, they can get stimulus checks. In addition, citizens married to undocumented migrants can receive checks.
Stefanik also said Democrats rejected amendments that would have “Held states accountable for underreporting nursing home deaths, invested in workforce development and expanded rural child care options.”
The first of these would target New York, where Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s administration for months did not disclose all COVID-19 deaths of nursing home residents.
Stefanik said the bill would reduce health insurance for the elderly in 2022. It is possible but not guaranteed. An Obama-era law dictates that spending increases and tax cuts adding to the national deficit automatically trigger program cuts a year later. However, the Senate can get past these cuts with 60 votes – so currently 50 Democrats and 10 Republicans.
Stefanik said she voted against the bill because it would maintain federal unemployment benefits until September, which she said “Deter people from returning to work”.
Republican lawmakers wanted an amendment to prevent abortion clinics from accessing emergency loans, citing the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal taxes from directly funding elective abortions. This proposal was rejected and its absence was one of the reasons Stefanik voted against the bill.
Other reasons Stefanik gave for voting against the bill are that she said he “Fund businesses, colleges and universities with partnerships with the Chinese Communist Party; provide zero funding for workforce development programs; not require the reopening of schools for in-person learning; sending billions of taxpayer dollars abroad for aid programs abroad; and create heavy and unnecessary barriers for families in need of child care.